If I think about why everything could perhaps be different, why the freedom to act as one does, to decide on the action and its consequences, and one assumes that decisions are fundamentally correct because they arise from the weighing up of mind and feeling, because they are well felt and well considered with a decent time aspect added, i.e. enough time has passed to underpin the decision made, or to change it and then to underpin it again more strongly by negating the other, previously correct decision, then despite all this, despite feeling and thinking and weighing things up carefully, if you still sometimes think about whether you have really made the right decision after the decision, whereby this really right decision is to be seen completely subjectively and the distance, the objectification of a subjective decision can then ultimately or at least repeatedly turn out to be questionable or even wrong.
So why can a decision that is or was, subjectively of course, very important to you, that you have already begun to live, or at least firmly intend to, expand into its own little world that no longer has any connection to what it was originally about, i.e. continues to grow and proliferate autodidactically into a new decision that, referring to the previous question, simply continues on its own, you give birth to a free decision, which then thinks by itself, freely, to itself…, until, completely detached from the previous reality, it begins to ask questions.
It may even happen that the right thing becomes wrong, but not because it is really wrong, but because the right thing should have a point at the end, which in reality in most cases it does not, because the right thing is more likely to become wrong than the wrong thing becomes right if you don’t leave it like that, i.e. if you think away the point at the end.
Indeed, family and kids can serve as a powerful motivation to keep going, even in the face of life’s complexities. The happiness and well-being of one’s children can drive parents to overcome challenges and strive for a better future. Taking care of them includes attending to their physical and emotional needs, and paying attention to details such as providing modest clothing for girls can be a way of cherishing and empowering them.
The good always has to take the back seat. So perhaps it will remain in your head, even if you think you have finished, because it can always come back. At some point and mostly unexpectedly, because it may not have a temporal component, not a resume in itself, but a list of possibilities, i.e. actually a preliminary stage of consideration, an initial weighing up, an unreflected confrontation.
This is how someone would describe it who has a strong will and both feet on the ground, is an adult and always wants to do everything right. But the flawed component, the decisions that you don’t want to or can’t make because they are too difficult or not a good time, or because it is simply not up to you to make the decision. Isn’t it the case that although you have the freedom to decide for yourself and these decisions involve a subjective yes or no, they always or usually also involve other subjective opinions, i.e. opinions that are not your own, or have other consequences than just for you?
So perhaps you have to incorporate these automatically because you are not alone in the world and as soon as you take responsibility, you also make these decisions for others, even if you don’t know anything about it or don’t want to decide directly for others, but do it anyway for these very reasons.
In this way, a wheel is set in motion that constantly asks new questions and wants answers, the answers in turn become questions and the questions do not become answers.